TheNextGeneration

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg
Showing posts with label David Spratt. Show all posts
Showing posts with label David Spratt. Show all posts

Thursday, July 11, 2013

David Spratt: Arctic melt hits food security in bitter taste of life on a hotter planet

Posted on 12:08 PM by Unknown
by David Spratt, first published in RenewEconomy, Climate Code Red, July 11, 2013

Arctic melt has pushed the Jet Stream into
a more meandering, S-shape pattern, dragging
down and stalling cold and wet conditions
over Europe
In the UK and Ireland,  wet summer and autumn followed by a cold winter and spring have hit wheat yields, potato production and cattle feed, a foretaste of how climate change can affect food security, even in the developed economies.

And the culprit in this drama is rapid Arctic melting, which has destabilised the Jet Stream and brought extreme weather – unusual cold, heavy snowfall, record rain and hot spells — to much of northern Europe and North America, and record heat to the Arctic. Following Superstorm Sandy’s battering of the US north-east coast in 2012, flooding in June across central Europe was the worst in 400 years.

Rapid Arctic melting – sea-ice volume in September 2012 was down by four-fifths compared to the summer average 30 years ago – has helped change the Jet Stream, the river of high altitude air that works to separates Arctic weather from that of northern Europe, Russia and Canada, and which governs much northern hemisphere weather.
The ice loss has added to ocean and atmospheric heat, pushing the Jet Stream into a more meandering, S-shape pattern, dragging down and stalling cold and wet conditions over Europe, and bringing record heat to the Arctic, as was dramatically experienced in Alaska last month.

Professor Jennifer Francis, of Rutgers Institute of Coastal and Marine Science, says the Arctic-driven changes to the Jet Stream allows “the cold air from the Arctic to plunge much further south. The pattern can be slow to change because the [southern] wave of the jet stream is getting bigger…  so whatever weather you have now is going to stick around.”

In March, new research found that “the severe loss of summertime Arctic sea ice — attributed to greenhouse warming — appears to enhance Northern Hemisphere jet stream meandering, intensify Arctic air mass invasions toward middle latitudes, and increase the frequency of atmospheric blocking events like the one that steered Hurricane Sandy west into the densely populated New York City area.”

And a recent study by Liu et al found that “the recent decline of Arctic sea ice has played a critical role in the recent cold and snowy winters” across the northern hemisphere.

Last September, Francis warned that 2012′s record sea ice melt could lead to a cold winter in the UK and northern Europe. And so it turned out, with farmers copping the consequences:

WET SUMMER AND AUTUMN: Six out of the last seven summers in the UK (since the record-smashing Arctic melt of 2007) have seen below-average temperatures and sunshine, and above-average rainfall. 2012 was the UK’s second wettest year on record, with autumn rain almost 50% higher than long-term average. In Ireland, twice the average amount of rainfall was recorded in many parts of the country during the three summer months of 2012.  People across the UK and Ireland will readily tell you that “We haven’t had a summer in four or five years” and, unusually for them, complain of “bitter” and “terrible” winters, with temperatures dropping as low as –18 C in Northern Ireland.

COLD WINTER AND SPRING: “It’s been the longest winter on record in this country. Not since the records began 70 years ago has there been a March as cold as this year’s. It’s been followed by the coldest April in 25 years in some areas of the country,” reported the Irish Examiner on 9 May 2013.  The Irish spring in 2103 was coldest in 62 years across most of the country, and dull and windy. Spring in the UK this year was the coldest in 50 years.

BAD COMBINATION: This combination of events has wrecked farmer’s schedules. Less growth in a dull 2012 summer – combined with water-logged crops and pastures in autumn – reduced yields, and some crops had to be left in the ground.  The spring 2013 growing season, including for apples and pears as well as pasture, started up to six weeks late due to the cold, dull conditions. And waterlogged fields meant that across Ireland cattle were still being kept in their winter sheds in the first week of June, ostensibly a summer month.  The consequences – whilst mild compared to climate-change impacts on vulnerable communities in the developing world from the African Sahel to Asia’s changing monsoons – show how easily the security of food production can be disrupted:

WHEAT:  In the UK, a wet autumn, hard winter and cold spring have resulted in one of the smallest wheat harvests in a generation, 30% below normal. Britain, generally the third biggest wheat grower in the EU, will be a net importer for the first time in 11 years. Charlotte Garbutt, a senior analyst at the industry-financed Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board says: “Normally we export around 2.5m tonnes of wheat but this year we expect to have to import 2.5m tonnes.” The latest analysis from the UK  Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs says total farming income decreased by £737 million in 2012 to £4.7bn, as farmers faced both crop losses and higher feed costs.

STOCK LOSSES: Late snowstorms across England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland in March 2013, with drifts of up to 5 metres, killed an estimated 40,000 newborn lambs. In Ireland’s west, one-quarter more animals died in the first three months of 2013 compared to 2012, with some vets trained to look for suicidal behaviour in farmers.

POTATO SHORTAGE: A wet autumn and poor season in 2012 prevented many crops being harvested in Ireland. Supermarket price-squeezing has also driven some farmers out of the industry, together resulting in reduced yields of at least 30 per cent in 2012. By spring 2013, potato prices had almost tripled in many parts of Ireland, with supplies exhausted and a reliance on imports from central Europe.

Limavady farmer, James Wray, told UTV News that said the changing weather in recent weeks had forced the price up: “This year has been a terrible growing season with loads of crops lost and loads of crops not harvested and any crops that have been harvested have produced low yields. There just isn’t any potatoes left in the country, there are no farmers with potatoes left, so whatever potatoes are about, are very, very expensive. If you go to any of the major supermarkets most of their potatoes are coming in from Europe just to bridge the gap.”

Potato shortages have a particular cultural resonance in Ireland as a consequence of the Irish potato famine of the mid-nineteenth century, which killed a million people and forced another million to emigrate.

FEED SHORTAGE: In the last week of May (the final week of spring), farmers in Ireland’s west were queueing for hay and silage imports from England, France and the Netherlands as their winter feed became exhausted and a lack of pasture growth in spring due to cold and overcast conditions, and wet fields, prevented cattle from being moved from their winter sheds.  More than 13,000 tonnes of feed was imported, but even so farmer Enda Stenson said local farmers “have neither money nor fodder.” Many had sold down their herds to be able to buy feed for the remainder.

BEES IN TROUBLE: Bad weather and disease is also threatening honey production, with some beekeepers expecting to produce no honey as bees have been unable to mate and hives are decimated. And bees play a crucial role in pollinating many crops. Jim Donohoe, of the Federation of Irish Beekeepers’ Associations, told the Irish Independent that the problem was weather related: “We’ve had bad summers before, but because of the wind, rain and lack of sunshine, we’ve had serious problems with colonies wanting to swarm, but the queens being unable to mate with drones which refused to fly because there wasn’t calm conditions. This year, we had a delayed winter where bees couldn’t fly. The flowers were delayed coming out, and that crucial period meant bees died from old age. All of this combines to about 50% of colonies being lost. If we don’t get milder weather, the losses will be closer to 75%."

These stories may seem trivial compared to the devastating impact of climate change on global food security and prices, and their political consequences. Writing on Egypt’s new political turmoil, Nafeez Ahmed notes that:
Food price hikes have coincided with devastating climate change impacts in the form of extreme weather in key food-basket regions. Since 2010, we have seen droughts and heat-waves in the US, Russia, and China, leading to a dramatic fall in wheat yields, on which Egypt is heavily dependent. The subsequent doubling of global wheat prices – from $157/metric tonne in June 2010 to $326/metric tonne in February 2011 – directly affected millions of Egyptians, who already spend about 40% of their income on food. That helped trigger the events that led to the fall of Hosni Mubarak in 2011, but the same configuration of factors is worsening.
And Lester Brown, head of the Earth Policy Institute in Washington, has warned that grain harvests are already shrinking as US, India and China come close to "peak water." He says that 18 countries, together containing half the world’s people, are now over-pumping their underground water tables to the point – known as “peak water” – where they are not replenishing and where harvests are getting smaller each year.

Together these stories paint a compelling picture of the threat to food security from climate change, not just in the Middle East, Asia and Africa, but in the heart of the developed world too.

http://www.climatecodered.org/2013/07/arctic-melt-hits-food-security-in.html
Read More
Posted in bees, crop yields, David Spratt, Extreme weather events, Peak food | No comments

Monday, April 8, 2013

David Spratt, Climate Code Red: “Critical decade” or “lost decade”? Part 1

Posted on 10:40 AM by Unknown
The conservative tide Political parties which vacillate between denial and delay on climate action are set to dominate Australian politics for the remainder of this decade, so how should we respond?

by David Spratt, Climate Code Red, April 7, 2013 | First in a series | Part two | Part three

The global average temperature is now higher than
at any time during the Holocene, the period of
human civilisation
Australian Climate Commission reports in recent months (here and here) emphasise that this is “the critical decade”. Yet the bookies say there is an 85–90% probability that the Gillard Labor government will lose this year’s federal election – and by a big margin – heralding an era of conservative domination of Australian politics at national and State levels.

Just before Easter, ALP stalwart and former ACTU secretary Bill Kelty wrote that: "The politics of the next few months is no longer about the result of the next election" (emphasis added). Everybody knows Labor is lost, baring Kevin Rudd rising from the dead and at least giving the conservatives a shake.

The next day, the Australian Financial Review reported that “Labor faces annihilation in marginal seats”. Polling in 54 marginal seats found the two-party-preferred (2PP) swing against Labor since the 2010 election had almost doubled, to 9.3% from 4.8% in two months, exposing Labor "to the loss of all 24 marginal seats it holds across Australia and risking up to 15 more semi-marginal electorates". It concluded that, at worse, Labor could win “as few as 32 seats in the 150-seat Parliament”. This was just after the Crean-Rudd leadership fiasco.

The irony is that while Prime Minister Gillard may proclaim to be personally “tough”, her government is anything but. It is strategically incompetent, communicates poorly, is disunited and faces an electoral wipeout. In Crikey, Guy Rundle wrote persuasively of 15 reasons why Labor is “on the edge of the abyss”. ABC presenter and former editor of The Drum, Jonathan Green, asked “Is it time to wonder whether saving the ALP is either necessary or desirable?”

The most recent Newspoll (25 March) had the ALP’s primary vote at 30%, whilst the Liberal–National Party (LNP) opposition had 50% of the primary vote and 58% 2PP. Just 26% approve of Prime Minister Gillard’s performance, whilst 65% disapprove. Crikey’s Bludgertrack 2013 (which averages and weights recent polls) as at 3 April points to an election result on current data of 48 seats to Labor and 99 to the LNP, excluding consideration of the five seats presently held by The Greens and independents.

In summary, most electors have long stopped listening to Julia Gillard (the corollary is that the higher her media profile, the more certain it is than Labor will lose), the LNP is likely to have a majority of 30+ seats, and is very likely to be in power for at least two terms, till 2019. (The last one-term federal government in Australia was that of Scullin in 1929–31.)
Electors’ dislike of Tony Abbott is only surpassed by their dislike of Julia Gillard, which is why Rudd as leader would have been a relief to many voters. At this late stage, Rudd would have been unlikely to keep Labor in power, but he would have at least saved some seats. These propositions were obviously too complex for the majority of members of Labor’s federal caucus.

THE SENATE: Team Abbott requires Senate support to amend or repeal the carbon price, the Clean Energy Finance Corporation and the Renewable Energy Target. The Climate Authority and Australian Renewable Energy Agency can easily be trashed by administrative measures.

It is not impossible for the conservatives to control the Senate after 1 July 2014, with the willing support of the one current DLP Senator, John Madigan. This could happen in a number of ways:
  • Scenario one: The LNP would need to win one of the two spots in each of the two Territories, three of the six Senate spots in four States, and four of the six Senate spots in two States. The latter is far from impossible and requires the conservative side of politics to win just over 57% of the two-part preferred (2PP) Senate vote in that State. The latest Newspoll puts the LNP’s national 2PP vote at 58%, whilst Bludgertrack 2013 says 2PP support for the LNP is currently 60% in WA, 57–58% in NSW and Queensland, and over 55% is SA.
  • Scenario two: In NSW and WA, the final Senate sport (after the LNP claim 3 and Labor 2) will likely be between the LNP and The Greens. It is likely that the Katter Party (Qld) and Xenophon (SA) will win Senate spots, which would exclude the LNP winning a fourth Senate spots in those States.  However, either or both of these could support the LNP in repealing or amending climate legislation. If the DLP, Katter Party and Xenophon all support the LNP, then it only needs to win three of the six Senate spots in each State (very likely) to have a Senate majority. In which case…
  • Scenario three: The Greens Senate candidate in the ACT, Simon Sheik, has the opportunity to win that seat from the LNP, a result which may be crucial to who controls the Senate if Scenario two were otherwise realised. His cause is aided by rucktions within the ACT Liberals in which long-standing Senator Gary Humphries has been rolled by the more right-wing faction of Zed Seselja, who is now their Senate candidate. Seselja is abrasive and unpopular, with a recent poll finding 49% had an unfavourable opinion of Mr Seselja, while 37% looked on him favourably.
If the LNP cannot muster a Senate majority on climate issues, then it would need a double dissolution, which would be unlikely before 2015, and after the next Victorian State election. This may be politically difficult: some of the gloss will have gone from Team Abbott and lower house seats would likely be lost, especially if the tide turns on State LNP governments with another two years in power; the economy may dip for global and/or domestic reasons; and punters don’t like unnecessary elections. Of course should Labor cave in (not impossible given the repeated pattern of backflips on climate policy) on some if not all climate legislation, then there would be no Senate impediment.

Turning attention from national to State politics, a look at the political balance of power and climate policy-making in the major economic states is also sobering.

QUEENSLAND: Labor was wiped out in 2012, and now has seven seats in Queensland’s one-chamber parliament, compared to 75 LNP seats. The most recent State Newspoll found the LNP with 62% of 2PP, similar to the result at the State election, with Labor’s primary vote at 27%. It’s hard to imagine how Labor can be competitive in 2015, or the LNP could possibly lose. Given the coming federal Labor wipe-out in Queensland, the odds are on the LNP maintaining government for the remainder of the decade.

NEW SOUTH WALES: Following the March 2011 election in NSW, Labor holds 20 lower-house seats compared to the LNP’s 69 seats. The LNP also control the upper house with 19 seats plus the support of Fred Nile and Shooters and Fishers Party (4 seats). Labor hold 14 seats and The Greens 5 seats.  The most recent State Newspoll gave the LNP 63% of the 2PP, compared to 37% for Labor, whose primary vote is down to an astounding 23%. NSW has fixed four-year terms, with elections in 2015 and 2019. Amongst many stenches surrounding the NSW ALP, the present ICAC hearings featuring Labor luminaries Eddie Obeid and Ian Macdonald are killing Labor’s brand. There is a very high probability of the LNP retaining power in NSW till 2019 at least.

VICTORIA: The first-term LNP State government, which controls both houses of parliament, had been trailing Labor in the polls, but the recent leadership change will improve its position. The next State election is in late 2014 and both sides have an opportunity to win.

WESTERN AUSTRALIA: In this year’s March state election, the LNP won 64% of the seats, compared to 36% of seats to Labor.  The ALP primary vote was 33%, compared to 53% for the LNP. In the upper house, the LNP have 61% of the seats. The LNP is in power till 2017, and are likely likely to be there till 2021 unless the state economy unwinds.

Taken together, it looks very likely that Australians nationally and in the big economic states – with the possible exception of Victoria – will be governed by conservative parties infested with a sizeable proportion of climate-denial parliamentarians, and with climate policies which could be charitably described as the politics of delay. Slash-and-burn of good environment and climate policies is probably a more honest descriptions, if the actions of incoming LNP governments in Victoria, NSW and Queensland over the last two years are any guide.

My perception at the moment is that most people in the climate movement think an Abbott victory is both appalling and all but inevitable. One big threat now is that the sense of inevitability combined with Team Abbott “looking like winners” may draw more (and especially younger?) voters to “back a winner”, which could effect both The Greens’ vote and the Senate balance. "Winners are grinners" is an old political maxim.

Labor-leaning environment and climate advocacy organisations (defined as those who have been unwilling to make substantial public criticism of Labor over the last decade, even when it was warranted) seem very subdued. Many have been largely off the radar since the climate bills passed in late 2011, and there are few signs yet of strategic  discussion on a likely Abbott victory.  My comments last year still seem valid:
What is even more disturbing is the evidence in 2012 that many of the larger organisations  who have been concerned about winning better climate policy also seem to have taken climate off the public agenda for now. Many big groups campaigned in 2011 under the “Say Yes” banner for the carbon price, which was legislated at the end of that year.  That was the start of a new battle, but in 2012 most of those objectively disappeared from the public discourse, leaving Labor and the Greens alone to fight it out against the opposition, the miners, the Murdoch press, the deniers, the shock jocks and all and sundry. To be honest, I have seen hardly a peep in the media in defence of climate action from the ACTU or unions, the aid and welfare sectors, or many of the big eNGOs. I can see only four explanations, all disturbing. Some ran for cover because it got too difficult or they had gotten what they wanted (for example, the welfare lobby); some didn’t understand the strategic need to continue fighting it out in public; the media and communications professional in those organisation were not up to the job; or these organisations and their campaigners were simply “exhausted”. All four point to management failure.
Perhaps because Labor decided to take climate off the agenda – selling its climate legislation as only about “clean energy” and those mysterious “household compensation” TV ads on tax cuts that made no link to the climate bills – then some groups also considered Labor’s electoral chances would be bolstered if they sat on their hands as well.  Their general unwillingness to take full advantage of the considerable public space created by the scientists, meteorologists and the Climate Commission on the link between current extreme weather events and global warming is not a good sign.

In contradistinction, some of the smaller advocacy groups are full steam ahead at a State, regional and sectoral level. The “Lock the gate” campaign against coal seam gas has garnered amazing local community support and gained great momentum and state and national political and media attention, and the campaigns against coal expansion are growing across the eastern States, they are better resourced and attracting critical support from both local communities and experienced climate activists.  There has been strong community support for renewable energy, reflected in both the one-millionth solar PV domestic installation, and in the “big solar” Port Augusta campaign.

When all is said and done, and despite the comings and goings in Canberra, closing down the polluters is always at the heart of effective climate activism and advocacy, especially since end-use emissions from Australia coal and gas exports will dwarf domestic emissions by a factor of three- or four-to-one. Researcher Guy Pearse says that the expansion of Australian coal exports with the bipartisan blessing of Labor and the LNP will mean that by “2020 or soon thereafter, Australia is exporting nearly twice as much CO2 as is Saudi Arabia today.”  Pearse estimates that:
… Australian coal exports will generate around 75Gt (billion tonnes) CO2 between now and 2050 – perhaps another 5Gt will come from domestic coal use, and 8-10 Gt from LNG if the expansion of coal seam gas proceeds.
This totals around 90 billion tonnes of CO2, compared to current total domestic emissions of 0.55 billion tonnes a year, or just over 20 billion tonnes in total to 2050 if current emissions were held constant.

From this perspective, neither Labor nor the LNP by their behaviour indicate  any significant understanding of the policy consequences of the carbon budget approachwhich the government’s own Climate Commission advocates, nor any grasp of what needs to be done in this “critical decade”. The brutal truth is that if Labor should remain in power and stick to an emissions reduction target of just 5% by 2020 (achieved by importing carbon credits) and actual emissions not peaking till 2025,  this would still be largely a lost decade. With Team Abbott, the outcome is worse.

More of this in part 3, but next in part 2 a look at the major parties after September 2013.

http://www.climatecodered.org/2013/04/critical-decade-or-lost-decade-1.html
Read More
Posted in Australia, David Spratt | No comments
Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • James Hansen: Tar Sands and Dirty Tricks
    by James Hansen, September 13, 2013 The New Yorker just published (16 September issue) an excellent article "The President and the Pip...
  • Andrew Glikson: Another link between CO2 and mass extinctions of species
    by Andrew Glikson , The Conversation , March 22, 2013 It’s long been known that massive increases in emission of CO 2 from volcanoes, assoc...
  • Bombshell: Recent Warming Is ‘Amazing And Atypical’ And Poised To Destroy Stable Climate That Enabled Civilization
    by Joe Romm , Climate Progress , March 8, 2013 New Science Study Confirms ‘Hockey Stick’: The Rate Of Warming Since 1900 Is 50 Times Greater...
  • Real Pragmatism for Real Climate Change: Interview with Dr. John Abraham
    by John Stafford, OilPrice.com, March 26, 2013 At a time when extreme weather incidents are causing billions in damages, businesses, governm...
  • Steve Horn: State Dept Keystone XL Enironmental Reviewer Claimed Delaware Tar Sands Refinery Made Air Cleaner
    by Steve Horn, DeSmogBlog, July 18, 2013 A  DeSmogBlog  investigation reveals  Environmental Resources Management, Inc. (ERM Group) , the co...
  • James Hansen interview (video) of why he retired from NASA to be more active in climate actions
    by Climate Science Watch, April 12, 2013 Sustainability Media Lab shot this video interview on April 10, 2013, with James Hansen on why he l...
  • Justin Gillis, NYT: Maverick climate scientist James Hansen retiring from NASA, can now take a more active role in lawsuits challenging states and the federal government over their failure to limit CO2 emissions
    Climate Maverick to Quit NASA by  JUSTIN GILLIS , The New York Times , April 1, 2012 James E. Hansen , the climate scientist who issued the ...
  • Exxon acting like national guard under martial law in Mayflower, Arkansas, Pegasus tar sands dilbit spill cleanup
    Arkansas town in lockdown after oil spill nightmare by  Suzi Parker , Grist, April 5, 2013 REUTERS / Jacob Slaton There’s one Exxon gas stat...
  • Steve Horn: State Department's out-sourced Keystone XL environmental impact evaluation performed without knowing pipeline's route!!!
    by Steve Horn, DeSmogBlog, July 8, 2013 The State Department's decision to hand over control to the oil industry to evaluate its own ...
  • "A Reconstruction of Regional and Global Temperature for the Past 11,300 Years," by S. A. Marcott et al., Science, 339 (2013); doi: 10.1126/science.1228026
    Science  (8 March 2013),  Vol. 339, N o. 6124,  pp. 1198-1201  DOI:  10.1126/science.1228026 REPORT A Reconstruction of Regional and Global ...

Categories

  • 2012 temperatures (3)
  • 2013 temperatures (6)
  • acidizing (1)
  • Adam Siegel (1)
  • Adaptation (1)
  • Aerosols (7)
  • Africa (2)
  • Al Gore (1)
  • Alaska (6)
  • albedo (2)
  • albedo flip (5)
  • ALEC (8)
  • Alun Hubbard (2)
  • Amazon rainforest (1)
  • Andrew C. Revkin (2)
  • Andrew Freedman (1)
  • Andrew Glikson (1)
  • Andrew J. Weaver (1)
  • Antarctic bottom water (2)
  • Antarctic Circumpolar Winds (1)
  • Antarctic Ice Sheet -- Western (WAIS) (4)
  • Antarctic Oscillation - AAO (1)
  • Antarctic warming (1)
  • Anthony R Ingraffea (1)
  • Anthony Watts (1)
  • Arctic amplification (7)
  • Arctic melt season (1)
  • Arctic Methane Emergency Group (7)
  • Arctic Ocean (5)
  • Arctic Oscillation (5)
  • Arctic sea ice mean speed (4)
  • Arctic sea ice volume (24)
  • Argo (1)
  • Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation - AMOC (2)
  • Atmospheric CO2 (8)
  • Australia (6)
  • Barry Bickmore (1)
  • bees (9)
  • Benjamin Santer (4)
  • Bidder 70 (1)
  • Big Oil Big Coal (89)
  • Bill McKibben (11)
  • Black carbon (2)
  • BOEMRE (2)
  • Brad Johnson (1)
  • Brazil (2)
  • Brian Eister (2)
  • Canada (24)
  • Carbon sinks (2)
  • Catastrophic climate change (1)
  • Charles Monnett (3)
  • China (15)
  • Chris Mooney (1)
  • Civil resistance (33)
  • Climate Change Criminals (24)
  • Climate Denial Machine (47)
  • Climate modelling (5)
  • Climate Patriots (2)
  • Climate sensitivity (1)
  • CO2 draw-down (1)
  • Consequences to infrastructure (1)
  • contrails (1)
  • coral reefs (1)
  • Corexit (1)
  • corrupt officials (60)
  • Coupled ice-ocean model (3)
  • Coupled ocean–atmosphere model (2)
  • crop yields (9)
  • CRU e-mails (2)
  • CryoSat-2 (1)
  • cyclones (2)
  • Dana Nuccitelli (9)
  • Dansgaard–Oeschger event (1)
  • David Roberts (2)
  • David Spratt (2)
  • Deforestation (2)
  • deglaciation (1)
  • Denial psychology (9)
  • divestment (11)
  • Donors Trust (2)
  • Drought (9)
  • dust (1)
  • earthquakes (3)
  • East Siberian Arctic Shelf (1)
  • Eastern Siberian Arctic Shelf -- ESAS (2)
  • Eemian (3)
  • Eli Rabett (5)
  • Elizabeth Kolbert (1)
  • Ellesmere (1)
  • ENSO (11)
  • Eric Rignot (1)
  • Extreme weather events (15)
  • Ferrel cells (1)
  • First Nations (9)
  • Flooding (7)
  • floods (1)
  • Forest fires (3)
  • fracking (47)
  • Fred Singer (1)
  • freshwater lens (1)
  • fugitive emissions (2)
  • Gareth Renowden (2)
  • Gavin Schmidt (3)
  • Geoengineering (1)
  • George Monbiot (2)
  • Gerald Meehl (2)
  • glacial runoff (1)
  • Global dimming (1)
  • glyphosate (1)
  • Graham Readfearn (9)
  • Greenland ice melt (21)
  • Greenpeace (3)
  • Greg Laden (3)
  • GrIS (9)
  • Hadley cells (2)
  • Hadley circulation (2)
  • Hans Joachim Schellnhuber (1)
  • Harrison Loony Tool Schmitt (1)
  • Heartland Institute (14)
  • heat dome (3)
  • Heat waves (13)
  • hockey stick (10)
  • Holocene thermal maximum (2)
  • hurricanes (1)
  • IceSat (2)
  • Igor Semiletov (4)
  • Inhofe (2)
  • Insurers (2)
  • Intertropical Convergence Zone - ICZ (2)
  • Jakobshavn Isbræ (1)
  • James Hansen (15)
  • Jason Box (10)
  • Jeff Masters (6)
  • Jennifer Francis (7)
  • Jeremy Grantham (1)
  • Jet stream (4)
  • John Abraham (15)
  • John Christy (1)
  • John Cook (2)
  • John Kerry (2)
  • Joseph Romm (12)
  • Josh Willis (2)
  • Judith Curry (1)
  • Julie Brigham-Grette (1)
  • Justin Gillis (3)
  • Katharine Hayhoe (2)
  • Kerry Emanuel (2)
  • Kevin Grandia (1)
  • Kevin Trenberth (14)
  • Keystone Principle (14)
  • Keystone XL (57)
  • Koch Industries (13)
  • Konrad Steffen (2)
  • Lake El'gygytgyn (1)
  • Leo Hickman (2)
  • Marc Morano (3)
  • Mark Boslough (1)
  • Mark Hertsgaard (1)
  • Mark Serreze (1)
  • Mass extinctions (1)
  • Mauri Pelto (1)
  • Medieval Climate Anomaly (2)
  • Meridonal heat transport - MHT (1)
  • Methane (2)
  • Methane Gun hypothesis (9)
  • Methane hydrates (11)
  • Michael Mann (20)
  • Michael Oppenheimer (2)
  • Michael Tobis (2)
  • Milne Ice Shelf (1)
  • Mitigation (1)
  • Monckton (6)
  • Monsanto (3)
  • Myles Allen (1)
  • Naomi Klein (1)
  • Natalia Shakhova (4)
  • national security (3)
  • Neela Banerjee (1)
  • neonicotinoid pesticide (9)
  • Nitrous oxide (1)
  • North Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (1)
  • North Atlantic Oscillation (2)
  • Obama (1)
  • OccupyWallStreet (5)
  • ocean acidification (2)
  • Ocean chemistry (1)
  • ocean heat content (15)
  • Ocean salinity (2)
  • Ocean temperatures (4)
  • ozone levels (1)
  • paleo-climate (4)
  • Paleo-CO2 (2)
  • Patrick Michaels (1)
  • Paul Douglas (1)
  • PDO - Pacific Decadal Oscillation (4)
  • Peak food (10)
  • Peak oil (1)
  • Peak Water (3)
  • Permafrost (1)
  • Permafrost - subsea (2)
  • Permian mass extinction (1)
  • Peter Gleick (3)
  • Peter Sinclair (13)
  • Peter Wadhams (4)
  • Petermann Glacier (1)
  • Phil Jones (1)
  • Pinatubo rebound effect (2)
  • pine beetles (1)
  • Pine Island Glacier (1)
  • PIOMAS (3)
  • polar bears (5)
  • Polar jet stream (8)
  • Polar vortex (2)
  • Positive feedbacks (1)
  • Precipitation extremes (4)
  • radiative forcing (2)
  • Ray Weymann (1)
  • Raypierre (1)
  • resilience (1)
  • resource scarcity (3)
  • Richard Alley (3)
  • Richard Somerville (1)
  • Rick Piltz (2)
  • Robert Corell (1)
  • Roger Pielke Jr. (1)
  • Rossby waves (2)
  • Russia (1)
  • saltwater intrusion (1)
  • Scott Mandia (1)
  • Sea level rise (13)
  • sea surface temperature anomalies (1)
  • Sediment cores (2)
  • Shell Oil (4)
  • snow cover (3)
  • Snowden (1)
  • Solar activity (1)
  • solar radiation (1)
  • Soot (3)
  • Stefan Rahmstorf (5)
  • Steve Horn (13)
  • Storm intensity (1)
  • Storm tracks diverted polewards (1)
  • Stratospheric Sudden Warmings (3)
  • sulfoxaflor (1)
  • Tamino (1)
  • tar sands (57)
  • Ted Scambos (1)
  • Terracide (1)
  • These people are completely insane (7)
  • Thomas L. Friedman (2)
  • threat multiplier (1)
  • Threat to our democracy (49)
  • Tim DeChristopher (1)
  • Tipping elements (1)
  • Tom Steyer (1)
  • Tornado statistics (2)
  • TransCanada (3)
  • trees (1)
  • tropospheric water vapor (1)
  • Typhoon Yasi (1)
  • Van Jones (2)
  • volcanism (1)
  • WAIS (1)
  • Waleed Abdalati (1)
  • Walker circulation (2)
  • Walt Meier (1)
  • Water shortage (2)
  • William Krabill (1)
  • Willie Soon (1)
  • Wind pattern changes (2)
  • Wind power (2)

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (500)
    • ▼  September (27)
      • James Hansen: Tar Sands and Dirty Tricks
      • Summer 2013 weather extremes tied to extraordinari...
      • Court rulings show judges accept climate science
      • DC judge denies another effort to derail Michael M...
      • Scientist Michael Mann named in top 10 influential...
      • Justin Gillis, NYT: A Climate Alarm, Too Muted for...
      • Top Obama aide Heather Zichal worked the Pavillion...
      • Call Sacramento. Vote NO on SB4
      • Graham Readfearn: The undiscerning climate bookshelf
      • Graham Readfearn: Australia's Department of Defenc...
      • Top Occupy Wall Street Cartoons
      • URGENT: phone your CA rep to prevent industry amen...
      • Tom Steyer, NexGen: Keystone XL bad economics for ...
      • Daily Mail Lies! No 60% recovery in Arctic sea ice...
      • Steve Horn: The Flip Side of Obama’s Keystone XL D...
      • Joseph E. Stiglizt, NYT: Why Janet Yellen, Not Lar...
      • "Global crop exposure to critical high temperature...
      • Naomi Klein: Green groups may be more damaging th...
      • Margaret Heffernan: Dare to Disagree
      • "Spring snow cover extent reductions in the 2008-2...
      • U.S. Becomes Largest Wood Pellet Exporter,Enviva, ...
      • Rebuttal to Michael Tobis' unsubstantiated attacks...
      • Why trust climate models? It’s a matter of simple ...
      • Steve Horn: "Frackademia" By Law: Section 999 of t...
      • MUST SEE, Peter Sinclair: No Slowdown in Global Wa...
      • Dana Nuccitelli: The Pacific Ocean fills in anothe...
      • Posts from August 2013
    • ►  August (78)
    • ►  July (74)
    • ►  June (56)
    • ►  May (62)
    • ►  April (105)
    • ►  March (98)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile